Inside Trump’s $150 Million Inaugural Fund: Corporate Influence Reshaping Politics
The Josh Lafazan Show - Episode 31
Today's top stories in US news, politics, government, and world affairs:
In the 2024 presidential election, there was one candidate who truly made waves with their fundraising efforts — and it wasn’t Donald Trump. Instead, it was Kamala Harris, who raised a staggering $1 billion in just 107 days as the Democratic nominee. But with the election behind us, it’s now President-Elect Donald Trump who is poised to break fundraising records once again — this time for his inaugural fund.
When a president is elected, the focus shifts to the inauguration, where the new leader is formally sworn in on January 20. Although the inauguration is a public event — with many recalling Sean Spicer’s infamous claim that Trump’s inauguration was “the biggest one ever” (despite being outnumbered by Obama’s 2012 crowd) — it has also become a major fundraising opportunity. The incoming president’s team sets up an Inaugural Fund, which can accept unlimited donations with no maximum cap, to cover the costs of the ceremony and related events.
While campaign donations are heavily regulated, there are no such limits for inaugural committees. Donors can give any amount, and corporations, unions, and other entities can contribute as well. This creates what some call an influence-buying “free-for-all” between Election Day and Inauguration Day.
Trump’s inaugural fund is expected to raise more than $150 million, breaking his own previous record of $107 million from 2017. The Wall Street Journal has reported that at least 11 companies and lobbying groups, which previously paused political donations after January 6, are now pledging significant funds to Trump’s inauguration. This marks a sharp contrast from the companies’ post-insurrection stances in 2021, where many expressed disapproval of Trump’s role in the Capitol attack.
Interestingly, some of these companies have removed or revised statements from 2021 condemning the insurrection, seemingly placing that period in the rearview mirror. The paradox is striking: businesses that once distanced themselves from Trump’s rhetoric and actions now seem eager to financially support his second inaugural.
According to Axios, donors who contribute $1 million or more are given a range of exclusive perks. These include access to a MAGA victory rally, a Cabinet reception with top nominees, intimate dinners with the president and vice president, and prime tickets to the swearing-in ceremony and inaugural ball. Essentially, large donors are promised VIP treatment as part of the inauguration spectacle.
While corporate donations to both Democratic and Republican inaugural committees are common, Trump’s situation is different. In 2016, his candidacy was so controversial that corporate America largely stayed away, with only a few major donations, including one from GoDaddy.com founder Robert Parsons. Fast forward to 2024, and we see an entirely different dynamic, with a wide range of corporations — from Amazon and AT&T to General Motors and Meta — contributing large sums to Trump’s fund.
There are several reasons why so many major companies are now supporting Trump. One likely factor is self-preservation. Many CEOs worry about losing out on government contracts or facing retribution from a president known for using his power to punish perceived enemies. Furthermore, ambition plays a role: executives may hope that a Trump administration will be more favorable toward certain industries, especially in areas like tech, cryptocurrency, and trade.
For example, cryptocurrency platforms like Kraken and Coinbase have donated $1 million each, likely in hopes that Trump’s administration will adopt a friendlier stance toward crypto regulation. Automakers like Toyota and pharmaceutical companies may also be seeking to mitigate any negative impact from Biden-era policies on tariffs or healthcare.
An intriguing question is whether these CEOs fear backlash for aligning with Trump. The Atlantic suggests that the answer is likely no. With Trump receiving close to half the country’s vote in 2024, many corporate leaders believe that supporting him may not result in the public outrage it would have in 2016 or 2020. This perception has been further facilitated by the fact that Trump’s inaugural committee is organized as a nonprofit, which means it is not immediately required to disclose donor information, allowing companies to sidestep potential consumer backlash.
Long before the inaugural fund officially opened, many of America’s wealthiest individuals were already trying to curry favor with Trump. Tech billionaires like David Sacks and Chamath Palihapitiya hosted fundraisers in Silicon Valley, raising millions for Trump’s cause. Even powerful media moguls like Jeff Bezos and Patrick Soon-Shiong — owners of The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times, respectively — took a more deferential stance, with their newspapers refraining from endorsing a candidate in 2024, which many saw as an effort to avoid antagonizing Trump.
As Trump nears his second inauguration, the impact of this influx of corporate donations remains to be seen. For Trump, the response is clear: he is reveling in the attention. His Truth Social post last week, "EVERYBODY WANTS TO BE MY FRIEND!!!" exemplifies his satisfaction with the outreach from corporate America.
But for the companies and their executives? We can only speculate. Will this new equilibrium between Trump and the nation’s business elite have long-lasting implications? Will we see further corporate concessions as the president-elect moves forward with his policies?
One thing is certain: this unprecedented amount of funding will shape the political landscape in the coming months. As Trump’s inauguration approaches, the full scope of corporate America’s support — and what it means for the future of U.S. politics — will begin to unfold.
#newsheadlines #congress #politics #newstoday #newsupdates #usa #politicalnews #trump